For over a century, stories about the Idoma people of central Nigeria have circulated in colonial writings, travel books, and second-hand accounts. These stories often relied on sensational claims—headhunters roaming the forests, grisly rituals unfolding in village squares, or even cannibal feasts said to define daily life. Such narratives found a receptive audience in Europe, where curiosity about “exotic” cultures mixed easily with racial stereotypes and imperial propaganda.
Thank you for reading this post; don't forget to subscribe to our YouTube channel here!
But as with many African societies subjected to colonial representation, the truth of Idoma history is far more complex—and far more human—than these lurid tales suggest. This article derives mainly from the 2007 book, Africa, Art and the Colonial Encounter: Inventing a Global Commodity by Sidney Littlefield Kasfir, published by Indiana University Press.
One of the most persistent myths is that the Idoma were cannibals. This accusation appeared frequently in the writings of nineteenth-century explorers like Adolphe Burdo, who described the “Akpoto” (a broad, often misapplied term that included the Idoma) as cannibalistic and barbarous.
Yet these accounts were crafted for European readers who expected adventure, danger, and encounters with “savages.” They were not built on evidence, and many of the illustrations that accompanied them were generic, drawn by artists who had never seen an Idoma person in their lives. Scholars reviewing these materials today consistently show that such claims relied on racial fantasy rather than observation. Within Idoma culture itself, nothing points to the literal consumption of human flesh as a social or ritual practice.
The closest cultural concept often mistaken for cannibalism was the idea of witches “eating” their victims. In Idoma spiritual belief—similar to many West African traditions—witchcraft includes metaphoric language in which a witch is said to “consume” a person spiritually. This does not involve any physical act of eating.
Yet early colonial officials, unfamiliar with the metaphorical nature of African spiritual vocabulary, interpreted these ideas literally. The result was a distorted picture in which spiritual metaphors were reported as physical horrors. Even in neighbouring Tiv country, where a major investigation into alleged cannibalism took place in the 1920s, the British government failed to find a single piece of physical evidence. What they uncovered instead were layers of witchcraft accusations, fear, and rumour—none of which justified the sensational reports that reached British newspapers.
Headhunting, however, did exist in Idoma society, and it requires careful contextual understanding. Like many societies around the world, the Idoma historically practised warfare, and within that framework, bringing home an enemy’s head served as a visible mark of bravery and a young man’s entry into full adulthood. It was never tied to cannibalism, nor was it characterised by the indiscriminate violence that colonial reports sometimes implied. Rather, head-taking was a regulated institution linked to age-grade societies, communal defense, and clearly defined social roles. A successful warrior could be celebrated for days, and the achievement allowed him to marry, assume certain titles, and participate in specific rituals. This was not savagery but a culturally organised system of honour, status, and responsibility.
The British often failed to appreciate these distinctions. They collapsed nearly every unfamiliar practice—headhunting, witchcraft, masquerade, human sacrifice—into a single narrative of barbarism. Administrative officers such as Charles Kingsley Meek bundled unrelated traditions together under headings like “Head-hunting and Cannibalism,” even when the evidence did not justify the pairing. In their reports, a trophy head taken in battle and a spiritual metaphor of witchcraft became evidence of the same mythical depravity. This rhetorical simplification made it easier for the colonial state to justify intervention, punishment, and the suppression of local institutions.
Another layer of misunderstanding came from the tremendous diversity within Idoma territory itself. What colonial observers called “Idoma” was in fact a constellation of more than twenty independent chiefdoms, each with its own traditions, histories, and external influences. Some districts, such as Akpa and Igede, developed richly carved wooden heads used in warrior masquerades, while others, like Agila, used actual skulls during dances well into the early twentieth century. In still other areas, warrior traditions had softened or changed long before the British arrived. By compressing this diversity into a single stereotype, colonial writers created a distorted profile of a people far more complex than their accounts suggested.
By the time the British imposed formal bans on warfare and headhunting between 1908 and 1925, many of these practices began to transform rather than disappear. Masquerades like Oglinye and Ichahoho evolved from warrior institutions into artistic and ceremonial performances. Carved wooden heads replaced real ones. Warrior dances shifted from celebrations of military victory to expressions of ancestry, identity, and communal memory. These changes show not a culture trapped in barbarity, but one capable of creativity and adaptation—even under the pressures of colonial rule.
The persistence of the cannibalism myth says more about colonial psychology than Idoma reality. For European administrators and explorers, portraying the Idoma as dangerous and uncivilised made the colonial project seem necessary and morally justified. For Victorian readers, such stories offered thrilling entertainment. But for the Idoma people themselves, these narratives erased the dignity of their history and the complexity of their culture.
Today, the task is to recover that dignity by returning to what the evidence shows. The Idoma were never cannibals. Their warrior traditions were rooted in honour, community, and rites of passage—not in the grotesque fantasies imported by outsiders. Their masquerades, like Oglinye, once tied to warfare, evolved into sophisticated artistic forms that still survive today. And their history, when read on its own terms, reveals a people who were not the monsters of colonial imagination but participants in the same human story of conflict, creativity, adaptation, and meaning-making that shapes cultures across the world.
AkweyaTV’s efforts at debunking these myths is not just an academic exercise. It is a necessary step in reclaiming a narrative once taken away and in ensuring that future generations understand the Idoma for who they truly were—not through the distorted lens of colonial fiction, but through their own lived history and cultural genius.
Follow the AkweyaTV channel on WhatsApp: http://bit.ly/3I7mQVx
Or scan the QR code:
